Topic Lifecycle: Dormant
This topic is currently dormant in the news cycle. It was last covered on Thursday 20 August 2026 and has not appeared in recent broadcasts.
Coverage trend (last 30 days)
How much coverage this topic got from each channel over the past month.
On screen
Stills are sampled automatically at 60-second intervals. Where shown, the still is the nearest available frame from the relevant broadcast segment and is included to show what was on screen during that part of the broadcast. A still may not correspond to the exact second of a quoted phrase.
Recent stories
The latest story timelines linked to this topic, newest activity first.
What was reported
A plain summary of this topic, built from the channels that covered it.
Erin Patterson, an Australian woman convicted of murdering three relatives by serving them a meal containing poisonous mushrooms, has begun an appeal against her conviction. Her lawyers argue she did not receive a fair trial, citing several grounds including concerns about the jury's deliberations and the admissibility of evidence. At the same time, prosecutors are appealing her sentence, which they say is too lenient. The appeal hearings are scheduled across two days. Patterson attended via video link from prison. Ian Wilkinson, the sole survivor of the meal, was present in court. A decision on the appeals is not expected immediately and could take months.
Key Claims by Channel
| Claim |  |  |  |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by all 3 channels | |||
| Patterson's legal team argued that the jury's verdict was compromised because the jury stayed in the same hotel as prosecution members and media. | |||
| Reported by a few · 2 channels | |||
| The prosecution is appealing Patterson's sentence on the grounds that it is manifestly inadequate. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Reported by BBC One | |
| Erin Patterson began an appeal against her murder conviction. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Reported by BBC News | Reported by BBC One |
| Defense lawyers presented seven grounds for appeal. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Reported by BBC News | Reported by BBC One |
| One ground for appeal was that the trial judge excluded photos of mushrooms that could support Patterson's claim of an innocent history of foraging. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Reported by BBC One | |
| A decision on the appeals could take months. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Reported by BBC One | |
| The prosecution will seek a sentence of life without parole. | Not reported by BBC One | ||
| Only on one channel | |||
| Erin Patterson was reported to have killed three relatives by serving them a meal containing poisonous mushrooms. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC One | |
| The appeal hearings are scheduled to take place over two days. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Reported by BBC News | Not reported by BBC One |
| One ground for appeal was that mobile phone evidence linking Patterson to an area where death cap mushrooms were found was speculative. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC News | Reported by BBC One |
| One ground for appeal was that Facebook messages about her family were irrelevant. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC News | Reported by BBC One |
| Defense lawyers objected to the way the trial prosecutor cross-examined Patterson. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC News | Reported by BBC One |
| Patterson attended the appeal hearing via video link from prison. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC News | Reported by BBC One |
| Ian Wilkinson, the sole surviving guest of the meal, was present in court. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC News | Reported by BBC One |
| Patterson received life imprisonment for each of the three murders. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC News | |
| Patterson received 25 years for the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC News | |
| The appeal consists of two separate appeals, one by Patterson and one by the prosecution. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC One | |
| The prosecution said there was no evidence of contact between jurors and others. | Not reported by BBC News | Not reported by BBC One | |
This is a cross-channel consensus summary, not an objective account. Consensus can be uniformly wrong, or omit what only one channel covered.
Flagged quotes
Disputed or loaded quotes across this topic's coverage, newest first.
Verbatim quotes flagged as contested or rhetorically charged. Presence here reflects language used, not a judgement of accuracy.
- contested
They began by arguing that her conviction was undermined by a catastrophic mix-up when the jury at last year's trial was deliberating staying at the same hotel as prosecutors and a key witness.
- contested
The prosecutions made it clear these points don't undermine guilty verdicts that they say were so inevitable on the evidence presented during the trial.
- contested
… of course all of the media covering the case as well a jury found Patterson guilty of using poisonous Mushrooms to kill three family members during a lunch at her house her defense team Argued that there has been a substantial miscarriage of justice and they want her 33 year prison term Overturned the jury in the trial was …
- contested
… jury in the trial was Sequested to stay at a hotel and they were staying at the same hotel as the prosecution her lawyers say that was Catastrophic and it's something that never should have occurred the prosecution said there's no substance to that and no evidence There was no actual contact between jurors and any other person the defense also claimed that Patterson …
- charged
Other evidence presented during the trial included damning Facebook messages about her family but those too were irrelevant they said.
- charged
Erin Paterson's lawyers have questioned a decision by the trial judge not to allow evidence that could have supported her argument that what happened at that meal was a terrible accident.
- charged
These include photos of mushrooms taken years before that lunch proof perhaps of an innocent history of foraging.
- charged
There were five days of often tense exchanges between the pair with Patterson's barrister today saying there's a real risk of there being improper inferences left in the minds of the jury.
- charged
Tomorrow they'll set out why they're challenging Patterson's sentence and want the triple killer locked up for life with no chance of parole.
- charged
There is the appeal by Erin Patterson to try and overturn her conviction, but the prosecution is also appealing her sentence that they say is manifestly inadequate.
- charged
Well seven news reporter Melina Sarris is in Melbourne following the case for us It has been 364 days since Erin Patterson was handed a life sentence now the triple murderer is back in court fighting to have her convictions Overturned she chose not to attend court in person today.
- charged
… evidence There was no actual contact between jurors and any other person the defense also claimed that Patterson Endured unfair and oppressive cross examination during the trial tomorrow The prosecution will have their chance to push for a harsher sentence They want Erin Patterson sentenced to life without parole and then of course it is up to the three judges …
Timeline
Where this topic appeared. Cells show coverage time and are darker when there was more coverage.
| Date | Channel 5 | BBC News | BBC One | BBC Two | Channel 4 | GB News | ITV | Sky News |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thursday 20 August 2026 | — | 2m 11s 2.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Wednesday 19 August 2026 | 2m 13s 6.1% | 2m 28s 2.1% | 3m 41s 4.5% | — | — | — | — | — |